Aslam Khan Alias sikander Khan vs State of Bihar — 282/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010029822026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

2729/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

282/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

43-District Addl. S J-V

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

Salaiya

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aslam Khan Alias sikander Khan

    Adv. Arif Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The District and Additional Sessions Court of Panchmahals, Aurangabad granted bail to accused Aslam Khan Urf Sikandar Khan in FIR No. 85/2025 (theft of 301 sheep), finding insufficient direct evidence linking him to the crime—his involvement rested solely on an uncorroborated confessional statement with no recovery of stolen property. The court imposed bail of ₹25,000 with a personal bond on identical amount and standard conditions, noting that other co-accused had already received bail from the same or higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-V

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Addl. S J-V

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Addl. S J-V

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-V

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Court of Panchmahals, Aurangabad granted bail to accused Aslam Khan Urf Sikandar Khan in FIR No. 85/2025 (theft of 301 sheep), finding insufficient direct evidence linking him to the crime—his involvement rested solely on an uncorroborated confessional statement with no recovery of stolen property. The court imposed bail of ₹25,000 with a personal bond on identical amount and standard conditions, noting that other co-accused had already received bail from the same or higher courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case