Lalan Yadav vs State of Bihar — 575/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010029712026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

2718/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

575/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

34-District Addl. S J VIII

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lalan Yadav

    Adv. Jay nandan

  2. 2.Lalji Yadav

    Adv. Jay nandan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Aurangabad Additional Sessions Court (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to the applicants Lalun Yadav and Laljee Yadav in a Forest Protection Act case (FIR No. 07/2025) involving charges of clearing forest land and cultivating opium. The court found the allegations serious but noted weak evidence since the forest official's report was based on villagers' complaints rather than direct investigation, and the applicants have no criminal history. The applicants were released on bail with two sureties of ₹20,000 each and must surrender within four weeks or face arrest, subject to court conditions under CrPC Section 438(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J VIII

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J VIII

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 575/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Aurangabad Additional Sessions Court (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to the applicants Lalun Yadav and Laljee Yadav in a Forest Protection Act case (FIR No. 07/2025) involving charges of clearing forest land and cultivating opium. The court found the allegations serious but noted weak evidence since the forest official's report was based on villagers' complaints rather than direct investigation, and the applicants have no criminal history. The applicants were released on bail with two sureties of ₹20,000 each and must surrender within four weeks or face arrest, subject to court conditions under CrPC Section 438(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case