Bigan Yadav vs State of Bihar — 276/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010029192026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
2672/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
276/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
GOH
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bigan Yadav
Adv. Sita Ram Sharma
Kail Yadav
Adv. Sita Ram Sharma
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) granted bail to accused-petitioners Bigan Yadav and Kael Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 341, 448, 323, 379, 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court relied on factors including the accused's clean criminal history, voluntary surrender, lack of any prior bail applications, the informant's non-appearance despite notice, and the fact that bail relief under Section 41(1) Cr.PC had already been extended by the IO. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and directed to deposit Rs. 1,000 each with DLSA and remain present until charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) granted bail to accused-petitioners Bigan Yadav and Kael Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 341, 448, 323, 379, 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court relied on factors including the accused's clean criminal history, voluntary surrender, lack of any prior bail applications, the informant's non-appearance despite notice, and the fact that bail relief under Section 41(1) Cr.PC had already been extended by the IO. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and directed to deposit Rs. 1,000 each with DLSA and remain present until charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts