Bigan Yadav vs State of Bihar — 276/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010029192026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

2672/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

276/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

GOH

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bigan Yadav

    Adv. Sita Ram Sharma

  2. 2.Kail Yadav

    Adv. Sita Ram Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) granted bail to accused-petitioners Bigan Yadav and Kael Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 341, 448, 323, 379, 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court relied on factors including the accused's clean criminal history, voluntary surrender, lack of any prior bail applications, the informant's non-appearance despite notice, and the fact that bail relief under Section 41(1) Cr.PC had already been extended by the IO. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and directed to deposit Rs. 1,000 each with DLSA and remain present until charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) granted bail to accused-petitioners Bigan Yadav and Kael Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 341, 448, 323, 379, 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court relied on factors including the accused's clean criminal history, voluntary surrender, lack of any prior bail applications, the informant's non-appearance despite notice, and the fact that bail relief under Section 41(1) Cr.PC had already been extended by the IO. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and directed to deposit Rs. 1,000 each with DLSA and remain present until charge-framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case