State of Bihar Chhotu Ram vs brijmohan Singh And Otheres — 88/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

SPECIAL CASE (SC-ST Act) - Harizan Atrocities Act

CNR: BRAU010028972019

Filing Number

2337/2019

Filing Date

25-Jun-2019

Registration No

88/2019

Registration Date

25-Jun-2019

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

SC/ST

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506,34
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(I)(r)(s)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Chhotu Ram

    Adv. ram naresh prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.brijmohan Singh And Otheres

  2. 2.Chauhan Rajkisor Singh

  3. 3.Krishan mohan singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) acquitted all three accused persons (Brijmohan Singh, Chauhan Rajkishore Singh, and Pankaj Singh) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 506/34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(2)(va). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses either turned hostile or retracted their statements during cross-examination, revealing that parties had reached a compromise and were living amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  12. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  13. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  14. 18-Jun-2025

    Police Paper

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  16. 08-Jan-2025

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  17. 22-Oct-2024

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  18. 22-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  19. 29-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  20. 05-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  21. 04-Dec-2023

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  22. 02-Sep-2023

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  23. 28-Jun-2023

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  24. 24-Mar-2023

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  25. 13-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  26. 25-Nov-2022

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  27. 12-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  28. 13-Jul-2022

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  29. 23-May-2022

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  30. 22-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  31. 17-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  32. 22-Nov-2021

    Appearence

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  33. 23-Aug-2021

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  34. 05-Jul-2021

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  35. 27-May-2021

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  36. 07-Apr-2021

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  37. 03-Mar-2021

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  38. 18-Dec-2020

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  39. 28-Sep-2020

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  40. 13-Jul-2020

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  41. 02-May-2020

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  42. 19-Feb-2020

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  43. 09-Dec-2019

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  44. 23-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 25-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) acquitted all three accused persons (Brijmohan Singh, Chauhan Rajkishore Singh, and Pankaj Singh) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 506/34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(2)(va). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses either turned hostile or retracted their statements during cross-examination, revealing that parties had reached a compromise and were living amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case