Kameshwar Prasad Singh vs State of Bihar — 553/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010028392026

Filing Number

2595/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

553/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

7-District Addl. S J-II

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

DEO

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kameshwar Prasad Singh

    Adv. Ram dular Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Aurangabad Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Kameshwar Prasad Singh in a case involving alleged misappropriation of 17,073 quintals of CMR stock worth significant economic loss to BSFC. The court found credible evidence of a deep-rooted conspiracy involving the petitioner (as District Manager) facilitating the siphoning of government stock and noted that he evaded legal process, warranting his arrest rather than pre-arrest bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the jurisdictional court and apply for regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-II

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 553/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Kameshwar Prasad Singh in a case involving alleged misappropriation of 17,073 quintals of CMR stock worth significant economic loss to BSFC. The court found credible evidence of a deep-rooted conspiracy involving the petitioner (as District Manager) facilitating the siphoning of government stock and noted that he evaded legal process, warranting his arrest rather than pre-arrest bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the jurisdictional court and apply for regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case