Nagina Devi vs State of Bihar — 533/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010027162026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
2478/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
533/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
DAUDNAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagina Devi
Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari
Butai Ram
Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari
Krishna Kumar
Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari
Gyanti Kumari
Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nagina Devi, Butai Ram, Krishna Kumar, and Gyanti Kumari, who were accused of kidnapping a 14-year-old minor girl. The court found that witness statements and the victim's own statement corroborated involvement of all petitioners (the co-accused's parents, brother, and sister) in facilitating the elopement and marriage of the minor, establishing prima facie offences under the POCSO Act and BNS sections 137(2) and 96. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nagina Devi, Butai Ram, Krishna Kumar, and Gyanti Kumari, who were accused of kidnapping a 14-year-old minor girl. The court found that witness statements and the victim's own statement corroborated involvement of all petitioners (the co-accused's parents, brother, and sister) in facilitating the elopement and marriage of the minor, establishing prima facie offences under the POCSO Act and BNS sections 137(2) and 96. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts