Nagina Devi vs State of Bihar — 533/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010027162026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

2478/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

533/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

DAUDNAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagina Devi

    Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari

  2. 2.Butai Ram

    Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari

  3. 3.Krishna Kumar

    Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari

  4. 4.Gyanti Kumari

    Adv. Chandrakanta Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nagina Devi, Butai Ram, Krishna Kumar, and Gyanti Kumari, who were accused of kidnapping a 14-year-old minor girl. The court found that witness statements and the victim's own statement corroborated involvement of all petitioners (the co-accused's parents, brother, and sister) in facilitating the elopement and marriage of the minor, establishing prima facie offences under the POCSO Act and BNS sections 137(2) and 96. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 533/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nagina Devi, Butai Ram, Krishna Kumar, and Gyanti Kumari, who were accused of kidnapping a 14-year-old minor girl. The court found that witness statements and the victim's own statement corroborated involvement of all petitioners (the co-accused's parents, brother, and sister) in facilitating the elopement and marriage of the minor, establishing prima facie offences under the POCSO Act and BNS sections 137(2) and 96. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case