Sandhya Devi vs State of Bihar — 256/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 20th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010027102026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
2473/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
BARUN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sandhya Devi
Adv. Dilip kumar singh I
-
2.Dwarika Mehta
Adv. Dilip kumar singh I
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge of Aurangabad, Bihar rejected the bail petition of Sandhya Devi and Dwarika Mehta, who were accused of assaulting Nakul Mehta (the informant's father) on 15.02.2026, resulting in his death five days later. The court found direct allegations against the petitioners supported by witness statements, and determined that releasing them on bail posed risks of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, particularly given the ongoing investigation into the fatal assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 256/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge of Aurangabad, Bihar rejected the bail petition of Sandhya Devi and Dwarika Mehta, who were accused of assaulting Nakul Mehta (the informant's father) on 15.02.2026, resulting in his death five days later. The court found direct allegations against the petitioners supported by witness statements, and determined that releasing them on bail posed risks of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, particularly given the ongoing investigation into the fatal assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts