Amit Kumar vs State of Bihar — 531/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010027082026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
2471/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
531/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
RAFIGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Amit Kumar
Adv. Shish Nath Singh
-
2.Rajaram Paswan
Adv. Shish Nath Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 531/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Amit Kumar and Rajaram Paswan, who faced assault charges arising from a land dispute scuffle. The court found that both parties sustained injuries during the mutual scuffle, the informant's injuries were simple in nature, petitioners had clean criminal records, and a counter-FIR existed, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 531/2026
Case Summary: 531/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Amit Kumar and Rajaram Paswan, who faced assault charges arising from a land dispute scuffle. The court found that both parties sustained injuries during the mutual scuffle, the informant's injuries were simple in nature, petitioners had clean criminal records, and a counter-FIR existed, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts