Jitendra Yadav vs State of Bihar — 526/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010026952026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
2459/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
526/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
HASPURA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jitendra Yadav
Adv. KAMLESH PRASAD SINGH
Rajesh Kumar
Adv. KAMLESH PRASAD SINGH
Upendra Mahto
Adv. KAMLESH PRASAD SINGH
Rajeswar Mahto Alias Ramishwar Mahto
Adv. KAMLESH PRASAD SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 526/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners (Jitendra Yadav, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Upendra Mahto, and Rajeshwar Mahto) in an illegal sand mining case, finding no eyewitness evidence linking them to the alleged storage of 4,000 CFT of sand and no similar criminal antecedents. Each petitioner must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and surrender within four weeks. Additionally, the court imposed a Rs. 10,000 fine on petitioner Upendra Mahto for concealing his criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 526/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners (Jitendra Yadav, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Upendra Mahto, and Rajeshwar Mahto) in an illegal sand mining case, finding no eyewitness evidence linking them to the alleged storage of 4,000 CFT of sand and no similar criminal antecedents. Each petitioner must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and surrender within four weeks. Additionally, the court imposed a Rs. 10,000 fine on petitioner Upendra Mahto for concealing his criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts