Birendra Kumar vs State of Bihar — 511/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010026342026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

2405/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

511/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

RAFIGANJ

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Birendra Kumar

    Adv. BIRENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Dr. Birendra Kumar, a homeopathic practitioner accused of performing an unauthorized cesarean operation that resulted in a patient's death due to improper stitching of blood capillaries. The judge found credible evidence from investigation, witness statements, and the postmortem report that the petitioner conducted the surgery without proper medical authorization and caused the death through medical negligence under IPC Section 304/34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 511/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Dr. Birendra Kumar, a homeopathic practitioner accused of performing an unauthorized cesarean operation that resulted in a patient's death due to improper stitching of blood capillaries. The judge found credible evidence from investigation, witness statements, and the postmortem report that the petitioner conducted the surgery without proper medical authorization and caused the death through medical negligence under IPC Section 304/34. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case