Nehaluddin Khan vs State of Bihar — 249/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010026222026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

2394/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

249/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

377

Police Station

AURANGABAD TOWN

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nehaluddin Khan

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court of Aurangabad, Bihar allowed the bail petition of Nehaluddin Khan, accused of charges including rioting, assault, and causing grievous injury. The court granted bail on the grounds that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since February 2026, had disclosed his prior criminal record in the current petition (which he had previously concealed), and sufficient time had elapsed. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court of Aurangabad, Bihar allowed the bail petition of Nehaluddin Khan, accused of charges including rioting, assault, and causing grievous injury. The court granted bail on the grounds that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since February 2026, had disclosed his prior criminal record in the current petition (which he had previously concealed), and sufficient time had elapsed. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case