Prakash Yadav vs State of Bihar — 479/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010025132026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
2297/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
479/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
Narari Kala Khurd
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prakash Yadav
Adv. anil kumar chaubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case 479/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Prakash Yadav's anticipatory bail petition filed under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS. The case involved alleged theft of surplus scrap from NPGCL premises; evidence showed that Yadav's employees—Adesh Kumar (loading incharge) and Ramdeo (driver)—tampered with weighbridges and transported 15,810 kg of scrap instead of the authorized amount, causing ₹6,00,000 revenue loss. The court held that as sole proprietor, Yadav's involvement could not be ignored given his employees' direct participation in the scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J- IV
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 479/2026
Case 479/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Prakash Yadav's anticipatory bail petition filed under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS. The case involved alleged theft of surplus scrap from NPGCL premises; evidence showed that Yadav's employees—Adesh Kumar (loading incharge) and Ramdeo (driver)—tampered with weighbridges and transported 15,810 kg of scrap instead of the authorized amount, causing ₹6,00,000 revenue loss. The court held that as sole proprietor, Yadav's involvement could not be ignored given his employees' direct participation in the scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts