Rinku Devi vs State of Bihar — 470/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010024362026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

2230/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

470/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

HASPURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rinku Devi

    Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh

  2. 2.Shyam Kumar alias Shyamu Chaudhary

    Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh

  3. 3.Lalbabu Chaudhary

    Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh

  4. 4.Ramlakhan Chaudhary

    Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case 470/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners accused of assault, molestation, and theft in a domestic dispute case. The judge found that all injuries sustained were simple in nature, the petitioners had clean criminal records, and a counter-FIR existed suggesting a mutual dispute, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 470/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 470/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners accused of assault, molestation, and theft in a domestic dispute case. The judge found that all injuries sustained were simple in nature, the petitioners had clean criminal records, and a counter-FIR existed suggesting a mutual dispute, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case