Shiv Kumar Yadav vs State of Bihar — 469/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010024312026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

2225/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

469/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

AURANGABAD MUFASSIL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shiv Kumar Yadav

    Adv. Mamta Kumari

  2. 2.Birbal Yadav

    Adv. Mamta Kumari

  3. 3.Nagendra Yadav

    Adv. Mamta Kumari

  4. 4.Ramrup Yadav

    Adv. Mamta Kumari

  5. 5.Umesh Yadav

    Adv. Mamta Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Birbal Yadav, Nagendra Yadav, Ramrup Yadav, and Umesh Yadav) in an assault and robbery case, finding only general allegations against them with no specific overt acts and no criminal antecedents. They were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 469/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Birbal Yadav, Nagendra Yadav, Ramrup Yadav, and Umesh Yadav) in an assault and robbery case, finding only general allegations against them with no specific overt acts and no criminal antecedents. They were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case