Lakhan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 465/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010023822026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

2184/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

465/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Jamhore

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lakhan Kumar

    Adv. YASHWANT KUMAR

  2. 2.Kundan Kumar alias Bhorik

    Adv. Yashwant Kumar

  3. 3.Manoj Kumar Alias Krishan Kumar Singh

    Adv. Yashwant Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case 465/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of stealing Rs. 1.20 lakh from the informant's house. The judge found that while the theft allegation existed, the petitioners had clean criminal records, the parties were engaged in a land dispute with a counter-FIR filed, suggesting possible false implication. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 465/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 465/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of stealing Rs. 1.20 lakh from the informant's house. The judge found that while the theft allegation existed, the petitioners had clean criminal records, the parties were engaged in a land dispute with a counter-FIR filed, suggesting possible false implication. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case