Rejaendra Yadav vs State of Bihar — 233/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010023702026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

2172/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

233/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

309

Police Station

GOH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rejaendra Yadav

    Adv. Jitendra singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional District Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, granted bail to Rajendra Yadav in a case involving alleged misfiring and assault with a pistol under BNS sections. The court found that despite the serious nature of allegations, the victim sustained only a simple lacerated wound, and considering the petitioner's nearly two-month detention since February 8, 2026, he deserved bail. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J- IV

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 233/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, granted bail to Rajendra Yadav in a case involving alleged misfiring and assault with a pistol under BNS sections. The court found that despite the serious nature of allegations, the victim sustained only a simple lacerated wound, and considering the petitioner's nearly two-month detention since February 8, 2026, he deserved bail. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case