Ajit Kumar alias Deopujan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 443/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010023032026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
2110/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
443/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
GOH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajit Kumar alias Deopujan Kumar
Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh
Bifan Ram
Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh
Jitendra Ram alias Jitendra Kumar
Adv. Dhirendra Kumar singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 443/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault in a village altercation. The judge found that while petitioner Ajit Kumar allegedly caused a leg injury with an iron rod and petitioner Bifan Ram allegedly attempted strangulation with a cloth, no sharp weapons were used and most injuries were non-vital, with the petitioners having clean criminal records and being co-villagers of the complainant. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, though the prosecution retained liberty to seek bail cancellation if the head injury proved grievous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 443/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault in a village altercation. The judge found that while petitioner Ajit Kumar allegedly caused a leg injury with an iron rod and petitioner Bifan Ram allegedly attempted strangulation with a cloth, no sharp weapons were used and most injuries were non-vital, with the petitioners having clean criminal records and being co-villagers of the complainant. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, though the prosecution retained liberty to seek bail cancellation if the head injury proved grievous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts