Sanjay Yadav vs State of Bihar — 228/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010022992026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

2106/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

HASPURA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Yadav

    Adv. Shyam sundar Sharma

  2. 2.Ranjan Yadav

    Adv. Shyam sundar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional District Sessions Judge, Aurangabad rejected the bail petition of Sanjay Yadav and Ranjan Yadav, who are accused of attacking the informant's husband with a gadasa and axe, causing multiple skull fractures and lacerations. The court found the allegations serious, involving charges under IPC sections including attempted murder (307), and determined that the nature and severity of injuries to vital body parts indicated murderous intent, warranting continued custody despite the petitioners' clean antecedents and claims of false implication in a land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J- IV

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J- IV

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Sessions Judge, Aurangabad rejected the bail petition of Sanjay Yadav and Ranjan Yadav, who are accused of attacking the informant's husband with a gadasa and axe, causing multiple skull fractures and lacerations. The court found the allegations serious, involving charges under IPC sections including attempted murder (307), and determined that the nature and severity of injuries to vital body parts indicated murderous intent, warranting continued custody despite the petitioners' clean antecedents and claims of false implication in a land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case