Sanjay Yadav vs State of Bihar — 228/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010022992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

2106/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

4-District Addl. S J- IV

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

HASPURA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Sanjay Yadav

Adv. Shyam sundar Sharma

Ranjan Yadav

Adv. Shyam sundar Sharma

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Addl. S J- IV

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

21-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Bail Order

Summary: The Additional District Sessions Judge, Aurangabad rejected the bail petition of Sanjay Yadav and Ranjan Yadav, who are accused of attacking the informant's husband with a gadasa and axe, causing multiple skull fractures and lacerations. The court found the allegations serious, involving charges under IPC sections including attempted murder (307), and determined that the nature and severity of injuries to vital body parts indicated murderous intent, warranting continued custody despite the petitioners' clean antecedents and claims of false implication in a land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Sessions Judge, Aurangabad rejected the bail petition of Sanjay Yadav and Ranjan Yadav, who are accused of attacking the informant's husband with a gadasa and axe, causing multiple skull fractures and lacerations. The court found the allegations serious, involving charges under IPC sections including attempted murder (307), and determined that the nature and severity of injuries to vital body parts indicated murderous intent, warranting continued custody despite the petitioners' clean antecedents and claims of false implication in a land dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case