Malti Devi vs State of Bihar — 435/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010022742026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

2086/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

435/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

489

Police Station

RAFIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Malti Devi

    Adv. Jitendra singh

  2. 2.Rina Kumari

    Adv. Jitendra singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Malti Devi and Rina Kumari, who are accused of poisoning the deceased bride (Pratima Kumari) within two months of her marriage. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed with the investigation, noting witness statements corroborating harassment allegations, the unnatural death circumstances, and the deceased's death at her matrimonial home within seven years of marriage, which invoked dowry death provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 435/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Malti Devi and Rina Kumari, who are accused of poisoning the deceased bride (Pratima Kumari) within two months of her marriage. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed with the investigation, noting witness statements corroborating harassment allegations, the unnatural death circumstances, and the deceased's death at her matrimonial home within seven years of marriage, which invoked dowry death provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case