Santosh kumar vs State of Bihar — 417/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010021962026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

2014/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

417/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

DAUDNAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh kumar

    Adv. Krishna Pratap

  2. 2.Ranjan Kumar

    Adv. Krishna Pratap

  3. 3.Ram Iswar Saw alias Ram iswar Saw

    Adv. Krishna Pratap

  4. 4.Pintu Saw

    Adv. Krishna Pratap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of four accused persons charged under SC/ST Act provisions and IPC sections (126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(2), 118(2), 3(5)) for allegedly abusing and assaulting a scheduled caste member using derogatory caste-based slurs on January 26-27, 2026. The court held that using such derogatory language against SC/ST members constitutes a clear offense under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, and bail eligibility is statutorily restricted under Section 18 of the Act, making anticipatory bail relief inappropriate in cases involving atrocities against protected communities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of four accused persons charged under SC/ST Act provisions and IPC sections (126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(2), 118(2), 3(5)) for allegedly abusing and assaulting a scheduled caste member using derogatory caste-based slurs on January 26-27, 2026. The court held that using such derogatory language against SC/ST members constitutes a clear offense under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, and bail eligibility is statutorily restricted under Section 18 of the Act, making anticipatory bail relief inappropriate in cases involving atrocities against protected communities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case