Santosh kumar vs State of Bihar — 417/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010021962026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
2014/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
417/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
DAUDNAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh kumar
Adv. Krishna Pratap
Ranjan Kumar
Adv. Krishna Pratap
Ram Iswar Saw alias Ram iswar Saw
Adv. Krishna Pratap
Pintu Saw
Adv. Krishna Pratap
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of four accused persons charged under SC/ST Act provisions and IPC sections (126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(2), 118(2), 3(5)) for allegedly abusing and assaulting a scheduled caste member using derogatory caste-based slurs on January 26-27, 2026. The court held that using such derogatory language against SC/ST members constitutes a clear offense under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, and bail eligibility is statutorily restricted under Section 18 of the Act, making anticipatory bail relief inappropriate in cases involving atrocities against protected communities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of four accused persons charged under SC/ST Act provisions and IPC sections (126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(2), 118(2), 3(5)) for allegedly abusing and assaulting a scheduled caste member using derogatory caste-based slurs on January 26-27, 2026. The court held that using such derogatory language against SC/ST members constitutes a clear offense under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, and bail eligibility is statutorily restricted under Section 18 of the Act, making anticipatory bail relief inappropriate in cases involving atrocities against protected communities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts