Rajnish Kumar vs State of Bihar — 211/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010021392026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

1960/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

633

Police Station

DAUDNAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajnish Kumar

    Adv. ASHOK KR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) rejected Rajnish Kumar's bail application in a case involving illegal firearms under the Arms Act. The court found that the crime was serious and affected public safety, and noting that the accused was the named accused in the FIR with a country-made pistol recovered from his possession, plus prior criminal history and that the trial was at an advanced stage, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) rejected Rajnish Kumar's bail application in a case involving illegal firearms under the Arms Act. The court found that the crime was serious and affected public safety, and noting that the accused was the named accused in the FIR with a country-made pistol recovered from his possession, plus prior criminal history and that the trial was at an advanced stage, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case