Ampu Sharma alias Ravi Ranjan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 402/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010021382026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
1959/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
402/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
AURANGABAD TOWN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ampu Sharma alias Ravi Ranjan Kumar
Adv. Anup Kumar Singh
Vimal Kishore Pandey
Adv. Anup Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 402/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ampu Sharma and Vimal Kishore Pandey, who were accused of assaulting an informant during a land measurement dispute on 28.01.2026, allegedly causing head and chest injuries. The Sessions Judge allowed the bail petition considering the petitioners' clean criminal records, the underlying land dispute between neighboring parties, and crucially, the injured person's failure to appear before the Medical Board despite multiple notices, leaving the nature of injuries unconfirmed. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties, though the prosecution retains liberty to cancel bail if injuries are later determined to be grievous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 402/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ampu Sharma and Vimal Kishore Pandey, who were accused of assaulting an informant during a land measurement dispute on 28.01.2026, allegedly causing head and chest injuries. The Sessions Judge allowed the bail petition considering the petitioners' clean criminal records, the underlying land dispute between neighboring parties, and crucially, the injured person's failure to appear before the Medical Board despite multiple notices, leaving the nature of injuries unconfirmed. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties, though the prosecution retains liberty to cancel bail if injuries are later determined to be grievous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts