Kriti Kumar vs State of Bihar — 392/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010021022026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

1926/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

392/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

7-District Addl. S J-II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

MALI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kriti Kumar

    Adv. Baban kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Kriti Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a kidnapping case. Although the victim's mark-sheet showed she was a major on the alleged date, her statements to police detailed kidnapping, forced marriage, and indecent acts by the petitioner. The court found sufficient credible evidence supporting the allegations and determined the case unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-II

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 392/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Kriti Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a kidnapping case. Although the victim's mark-sheet showed she was a major on the alleged date, her statements to police detailed kidnapping, forced marriage, and indecent acts by the petitioner. The court found sufficient credible evidence supporting the allegations and determined the case unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case