KRIT MAHTO vs NAGESHWAR SINGH — 391/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,302,379,323,307,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRAU010020232016
Filing Number
32978/2016
Filing Date
01-06-2016
Registration No
391/2016
Registration Date
01-06-2016
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
KUTUMBA
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRIT MAHTO
Respondent(s)
NAGESHWAR SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Addl. S J- IV
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, Aurangabad acquitted accused Nageshwar Singh of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 302, 323, 307, 504, 149 and the Arms Act 1959 and Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court found that while the prosecution presented three eyewitnesses, none had actual knowledge of the incident, rendering their testimonies hearsay and unreliable. With no credible evidence to establish that the accused committed the alleged crime of mob violence and assault on October 10, 2010, the court discharged him from all charges and released all sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, Aurangabad acquitted accused Nageshwar Singh of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 302, 323, 307, 504, 149 and the Arms Act 1959 and Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court found that while the prosecution presented three eyewitnesses, none had actual knowledge of the incident, rendering their testimonies hearsay and unreliable. With no credible evidence to establish that the accused committed the alleged crime of mob violence and assault on October 10, 2010, the court discharged him from all charges and released all sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts