Rahul Kumar vs State of Bihar — 374/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010019692026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
1798/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
374/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rahul Kumar
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Rahul Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a criminal case involving allegations of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 406, 420, 384, 504, and 120(B)/34. The court found that Rs. 27,99,200 was transferred to the petitioner's bank account over a decade with documentary evidence supporting the transactions, and since the amount involved was substantial and allegedly not returned, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J- IV
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 374/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Rahul Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a criminal case involving allegations of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 406, 420, 384, 504, and 120(B)/34. The court found that Rs. 27,99,200 was transferred to the petitioner's bank account over a decade with documentary evidence supporting the transactions, and since the amount involved was substantial and allegedly not returned, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts