Sanjiv Kumar Alias Kumar Sanjiv Ranjan vs State of Bihar — 373/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010019542026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

1784/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

373/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

113

Police Station

RAFIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Sanjiv Kumar Alias Kumar Sanjiv Ranjan

Adv. Raj Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Bail Order

Case 373/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Sanjiv Kumar, a Panchayat Housing Assistant, who faced charges under sections 319(1) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly demanding illegal money during PMAYG housing surveys. The court found no serious allegations against the petitioner, noting that even the prosecutor conceded nothing substantive emerged in the case diary, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was released on anticipatory bail with a Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 373/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Sanjiv Kumar, a Panchayat Housing Assistant, who faced charges under sections 319(1) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly demanding illegal money during PMAYG housing surveys. The court found no serious allegations against the petitioner, noting that even the prosecutor conceded nothing substantive emerged in the case diary, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was released on anticipatory bail with a Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case