Lalan Ray vs State of Bihar — 372/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010019312026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

1761/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

372/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

7-District Addl. S J-II

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

271

Police Station

Jamhore

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lalan Ray

    Adv. Dhananjay Kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Lalan Ray in a land dispute case involving assault allegations. The court found that while co-accused persons were directly involved in assaulting the informant's family, there was no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner himself—only a charge of giving orders. Considering the land dispute context, mutual counter-cases, minor injuries, and that co-accused had already been granted bail, the court released the petitioner on bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Addl. S J-II

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Addl. S J-II

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 372/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Lalan Ray in a land dispute case involving assault allegations. The court found that while co-accused persons were directly involved in assaulting the informant's family, there was no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner himself—only a charge of giving orders. Considering the land dispute context, mutual counter-cases, minor injuries, and that co-accused had already been granted bail, the court released the petitioner on bail of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case