Pushpendra Sharma vs State of Bihar — 191/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010019012026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
1734/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
191/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpendra Sharma
Adv. Md Qaiyum ansari
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted regular bail to Pushpendra Sharma, accused of dowry harassment and cruelty charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 498(A), and 506. The petitioner's previous anticipatory bail was cancelled due to non-compliance with the High Court's direction to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly to the complainant, and he was sent to judicial custody on 02.02.2026. The court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering his prolonged custody for non-compliance rather than substantive guilt, and noting his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted regular bail to Pushpendra Sharma, accused of dowry harassment and cruelty charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 498(A), and 506. The petitioner's previous anticipatory bail was cancelled due to non-compliance with the High Court's direction to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly to the complainant, and he was sent to judicial custody on 02.02.2026. The court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering his prolonged custody for non-compliance rather than substantive guilt, and noting his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts