Pushpendra Sharma vs State of Bihar — 191/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010019012026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
1734/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
191/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pushpendra Sharma
Adv. Md Qaiyum ansari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted regular bail to Pushpendra Sharma, accused of dowry harassment and cruelty charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 498(A), and 506. The petitioner's previous anticipatory bail was cancelled due to non-compliance with the High Court's direction to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly to the complainant, and he was sent to judicial custody on 02.02.2026. The court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering his prolonged custody for non-compliance rather than substantive guilt, and noting his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 191/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted regular bail to Pushpendra Sharma, accused of dowry harassment and cruelty charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 498(A), and 506. The petitioner's previous anticipatory bail was cancelled due to non-compliance with the High Court's direction to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly to the complainant, and he was sent to judicial custody on 02.02.2026. The court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering his prolonged custody for non-compliance rather than substantive guilt, and noting his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts