Harsh Kumar vs State of Bihar — 188/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010018862026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

1720/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

461

Police Station

AURANGABAD MUFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Harsh Kumar

Adv. Krishna Pratap

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

18-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Bail Order

The District Court in Aurangabad, Bihar rejected the bail application of Harsh Kumar (26), who was accused of kidnapping a minor girl (aged 16 years 11 months). The court found substantial evidence of the alleged crime, including 239 phone calls between the accused and the victim, continuous conversations on the night before the incident, and the victim's statement confirming she traveled to Kolkata with the accused. Despite the defense arguing it was a consensual relationship, the court held that the victim's minor status under parental guardianship constituted kidnapping under serious charges, and the ongoing investigation necessitated continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court in Aurangabad, Bihar rejected the bail application of Harsh Kumar (26), who was accused of kidnapping a minor girl (aged 16 years 11 months). The court found substantial evidence of the alleged crime, including 239 phone calls between the accused and the victim, continuous conversations on the night before the incident, and the victim's statement confirming she traveled to Kolkata with the accused. Despite the defense arguing it was a consensual relationship, the court held that the victim's minor status under parental guardianship constituted kidnapping under serious charges, and the ongoing investigation necessitated continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case