Gaya Singh vs State of Bihar — 331/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010017272026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
1572/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
331/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
144
Police Station
Fesar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gaya Singh
Adv. Manoj Kumar tiwary
Sushil Chandarwanshi
Adv. Manoj Kumar tiwary
Vishal Chandarwanshi
Adv. Manoj Kumar tiwary
Lallan Singh
Adv. Manoj Kumar tiwary
Sintu Chandarwanshi
Adv. Manoj Kumar tiwary
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Sessions Court of Aurangabad (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Gaya Singh, Sushil Chanderwanshi, Vishal Chanderwanshi, and Lallan Singh) in a case involving alleged assault and rioting. The court found only general allegations against them with no specific injuries attributed to them, noted their clean criminal records, and cited prosecution delays in submitting injury reports. One petitioner (Sintu Chandrawanshi) withdrew his petition as specific injury allegations existed against him. The four granted petitioners must furnish Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Sessions Court of Aurangabad (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Gaya Singh, Sushil Chanderwanshi, Vishal Chanderwanshi, and Lallan Singh) in a case involving alleged assault and rioting. The court found only general allegations against them with no specific injuries attributed to them, noted their clean criminal records, and cited prosecution delays in submitting injury reports. One petitioner (Sintu Chandrawanshi) withdrew his petition as specific injury allegations existed against him. The four granted petitioners must furnish Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts