THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SHASHI SINGH vs VIKASH KUMAR SINGH — 60/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRAU010016982026
Filing Number
1545/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0162
Police Station
AURANGABAD MUFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SHASHI SINGH
Adv. Pushkar Agrawal
Respondent(s)
VIKASH KUMAR SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad acquitted Vikash Kumar Singh of charges under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. All key prosecution witnesses—including the informant and deceased's family members—were declared hostile and testified that the deceased was mentally unwell and voluntarily consumed medicine, with no evidence of dowry demands or cruelty by the accused. Investigation lapses, absence of direct evidence linking the accused to poison administration, and an incomplete chain of circumstances further weakened the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad acquitted Vikash Kumar Singh of charges under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. All key prosecution witnesses—including the informant and deceased's family members—were declared hostile and testified that the deceased was mentally unwell and voluntarily consumed medicine, with no evidence of dowry demands or cruelty by the accused. Investigation lapses, absence of direct evidence linking the accused to poison administration, and an incomplete chain of circumstances further weakened the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts