Prahalad Kumar vs State of Bihar — 307/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010016192026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
1476/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
307/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
7-District Addl. S J-II
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
314
Police Station
GOH
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prahalad Kumar
Adv. Mukesh Kumar singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Addl. S J-II
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Prahalad Kumar v/s State of Bihar (A.B.P 307/2026) The court rejected Prahalad Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in an illegal mining case. Kumar, a K-license holder, was accused of unlawfully enhancing sand/stone chip capping capacity by 39,200 MT in the mines portal and receiving minerals via railway without valid documentation, causing Rs 10.48 crore government revenue loss. The court found the allegations constituted a "sophisticated cyber-economic offence" supported by witness statements and documentary evidence, determining the case unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prahalad Kumar v/s State of Bihar (A.B.P 307/2026) The court rejected Prahalad Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in an illegal mining case. Kumar, a K-license holder, was accused of unlawfully enhancing sand/stone chip capping capacity by 39,200 MT in the mines portal and receiving minerals via railway without valid documentation, causing Rs 10.48 crore government revenue loss. The court found the allegations constituted a "sophisticated cyber-economic offence" supported by witness statements and documentary evidence, determining the case unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts