Prahalad Kumar vs State of Bihar — 307/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010016192026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

1476/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

307/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

7-District Addl. S J-II

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

314

Police Station

GOH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Prahalad Kumar

Adv. Mukesh Kumar singh

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Addl. S J-II

16-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

HEARING

04-04-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: Prahalad Kumar v/s State of Bihar (A.B.P 307/2026) The court rejected Prahalad Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in an illegal mining case. Kumar, a K-license holder, was accused of unlawfully enhancing sand/stone chip capping capacity by 39,200 MT in the mines portal and receiving minerals via railway without valid documentation, causing Rs 10.48 crore government revenue loss. The court found the allegations constituted a "sophisticated cyber-economic offence" supported by witness statements and documentary evidence, determining the case unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Prahalad Kumar v/s State of Bihar (A.B.P 307/2026) The court rejected Prahalad Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in an illegal mining case. Kumar, a K-license holder, was accused of unlawfully enhancing sand/stone chip capping capacity by 39,200 MT in the mines portal and receiving minerals via railway without valid documentation, causing Rs 10.48 crore government revenue loss. The court found the allegations constituted a "sophisticated cyber-economic offence" supported by witness statements and documentary evidence, determining the case unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case