Anandi Singh Alias Abhai Kishore Singh Alias Anandkishore Singh vs State of Bihar — 18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRAU010014162026

Filing Number

1285/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

1.Anandi Singh Alias Abhai Kishore Singh Alias Anandkishore Singh

Adv. vijay kumar singh

Respondent(s)

1.State of Bihar

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
09-Apr-2026

DisposalView PDF

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order dated 13.10.2022 that had taken cognizance and issued processes against the revisionist under IPC sections 144, 448, 436 and Arms Act Section 27. The court found the lower court's order suffered from manifest infirmities as it proceeded mechanically without proper service of summons, no service reports, or execution records—violating mandatory procedural safeguards under the Cr.P.C. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with due compliance of all procedural requirements and adequate opportunity to the revisionist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
09-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal District And Sessions Judge
26-Mar-2026

Order

Principal District And Sessions Judge
12-Mar-2026

Hearing On Addmission

Principal District And Sessions Judge
17-Feb-2026

Hearing On Addmission

Principal District And Sessions Judge
09-Feb-2026

Hearing On Addmission

Principal District And Sessions Judge
03-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
31-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order dated 13.10.2022 that had taken cognizance and issued processes against the revisionist under IPC sections 144, 448, 436 and Arms Act Section 27. The court found the lower court's order suffered from manifest infirmities as it proceeded mechanically without proper service of summons, no service reports, or execution records—violating mandatory procedural safeguards under the Cr.P.C. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration with due compliance of all procedural requirements and adequate opportunity to the revisionist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.