Bhola Kumar alias Bhindhyachal Kumar vs State of Bihar — 205/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010010292026
e-Filing Number
22-01-2026
Filing Number
940/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
205/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
RAFIGANJ
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhola Kumar alias Bhindhyachal Kumar
Adv. Baliram Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District and Additional Sessions Judge of Aurangabad, Bihar refused the anticipatory bail application of Bhola Kumar, who was accused under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly abusing a Scheduled Caste member by using a caste-based slur. The court held that Section 18 of the SC/ST Act bars anticipatory bail in such cases and that using derogatory caste-based language against SC members with intent to insult, even in public spaces, constitutes an offense, emphasizing constitutional values of equality and dignity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District and Additional Sessions Judge of Aurangabad, Bihar refused the anticipatory bail application of Bhola Kumar, who was accused under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly abusing a Scheduled Caste member by using a caste-based slur. The court held that Section 18 of the SC/ST Act bars anticipatory bail in such cases and that using derogatory caste-based language against SC members with intent to insult, even in public spaces, constitutes an offense, emphasizing constitutional values of equality and dignity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts