MD EMTIYAZ vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 213/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAR010024502026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

2313/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

213/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Division Araria

Judge

3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

BATHNAHA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6)
ARMS ACT Section 27

Petitioner(s)

MD EMTIYAZ

Adv. NAUSHAD AKHTAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I

07-04-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Order

Summary of Case 213/2026 (MD Emtiyaz v. State of Bihar): The court granted bail to petitioner MD Emtiyaz, accused in a dacoity case (FIR 18/2025, Bathnaha Police Station) involving an alleged armed robbery of ₹1,50,000 on 03-03-2025. The court found the petitioner's detention for approximately three months sufficient, noting weak prosecution evidence (identification based solely on a co-accused's statement) and no incriminating material recovered from him. Bail was approved on conditions including deposit of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal value, abstention from crime, cooperation with investigation, and appearance until charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 213/2026 (MD Emtiyaz v. State of Bihar): The court granted bail to petitioner MD Emtiyaz, accused in a dacoity case (FIR 18/2025, Bathnaha Police Station) involving an alleged armed robbery of ₹1,50,000 on 03-03-2025. The court found the petitioner's detention for approximately three months sufficient, noting weak prosecution evidence (identification based solely on a co-accused's statement) and no incriminating material recovered from him. Bail was approved on conditions including deposit of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal value, abstention from crime, cooperation with investigation, and appearance until charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Araria All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case