ZAHID vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 497/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAR010022832026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
2154/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
497/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DJ Division Araria
Judge
3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
137
Police Station
SIKTI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ZAHID
Adv. SHAH MD SHAKIR ALAM
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Zahid v. State of Bihar (497/2026) The court rejected Zahid's bail application in an assault case arising from an alleged incident on July 27, 2025, where the victim Sufaid Alam suffered head injuries with two wounds. While Zahid's counsel argued the accusations were false and motivated by a matrimonial dispute, the court found the allegations credible, noting the victim's wife had married the petitioner and the victim sustained two head wounds. The court distinguished this case from two co-accused who were granted bail, holding that since direct injury-causing charges were levied against Zahid and evidence supported the injuries, the bail request was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Zahid v. State of Bihar (497/2026) The court rejected Zahid's bail application in an assault case arising from an alleged incident on July 27, 2025, where the victim Sufaid Alam suffered head injuries with two wounds. While Zahid's counsel argued the accusations were false and motivated by a matrimonial dispute, the court found the allegations credible, noting the victim's wife had married the petitioner and the victim sustained two head wounds. The court distinguished this case from two co-accused who were granted bail, holding that since direct injury-causing charges were levied against Zahid and evidence supported the injuries, the bail request was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts