OM PRAKASH MEHTA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 370/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(3),352,351(2),303(2),76,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAR010016802026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
1582/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
370/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
DJ Division Araria
Judge
3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
NARPATGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
OM PRAKASH MEHTA
Adv. KISHOR KR DAS
RAJO DEVI
Adv. KISHOR KR DAS
SARWASWATI KUMARI
Adv. KISHOR KR DAS
ANJALI DEVI
Adv. KISHOR KR DAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 370/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Om Prakash Mehta, Rajo Devi, and Sarswati Kumari in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 303(2), 76, and 3(5), arising from an alleged incident on 06-01-2026. The court found that both parties reached a settlement, the allegations were baseless and unsupported, and the petitioners had no criminal history, thereby allowing bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and appearing before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 370/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Om Prakash Mehta, Rajo Devi, and Sarswati Kumari in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 303(2), 76, and 3(5), arising from an alleged incident on 06-01-2026. The court found that both parties reached a settlement, the allegations were baseless and unsupported, and the petitioners had no criminal history, thereby allowing bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and appearing before the court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts