HUSNERA KHATOON ALIAS HUSNE ARA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 321/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAR010015772026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

1487/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

321/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

DJ Division Araria

Judge

3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

137

Police Station

SIKTI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

HUSNERA KHATOON ALIAS HUSNE ARA

Adv. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I

12-03-2026

Disposed

13-02-2026

HEARING

12-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 321/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Husnera Khatoon in this case arising from Sickty Police Station FIR 137/2025 (charges under IPC §115(2), 126(2), 109, 352, 3(5)). The court found that no direct injury allegations were leveled against the petitioner and the injury report indicated wounds caused by co-accused, not the petitioner, noting she had no criminal history and appeared to be falsely implicated due to enmity and local politics. Condition: Bail granted with ₹10,000 bond plus two sureties of equal amount, with court's satisfaction that petitioner will remain present until trial and comply with BNSS §482(2) conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 321/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Husnera Khatoon in this case arising from Sickty Police Station FIR 137/2025 (charges under IPC §115(2), 126(2), 109, 352, 3(5)). The court found that no direct injury allegations were leveled against the petitioner and the injury report indicated wounds caused by co-accused, not the petitioner, noting she had no criminal history and appeared to be falsely implicated due to enmity and local politics. Condition: Bail granted with ₹10,000 bond plus two sureties of equal amount, with court's satisfaction that petitioner will remain present until trial and comply with BNSS §482(2) conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Araria All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case