MUNNA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 253/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 366. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAR010012922026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

1220/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Division Araria

Judge

29-District And Addl. Sessions Judge-VI -Cum- Spl (Pocso) Judge

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

TARABARI

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 366

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNNA

    Adv. ASHOK PRASAD BISWAS

  2. 2.MANOJ MANJHI

    Adv. ASHOK PRASAD BISWAS

  3. 3.AMAR MANJHI

    Adv. ASHOK PRASAD BISWAS

  4. 4.BISHESHWER MANJHI

    Adv. ASHOK PRASAD BISWAS

  5. 5.RAMWATI DEVI ALIAS SAMPATIYA DEVI

    Adv. ASHOK PRASAD BISWAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court partially allowed the anticipatory bail petition. Petitioners Munna, Manoj Manjhi, and Amar Manjhi had their bail rejected due to credible evidence—the victim's statement named them as perpetrators of abduction and sexual assault under IPC sections 363/34 and 366A. However, petitioners Bisheshwar Manjhi and Ramwati Devi were granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds each, as they had no alleged role in the sexual assault. The court found no compromise warranted given the heinous nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-VI -Cum- Spl (Pocso) Judge

  4. 18-May-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-VI -Cum- Spl (Pocso) Judge

  5. 12-May-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-VI -Cum- Spl (Pocso) Judge

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the anticipatory bail petition. Petitioners Munna, Manoj Manjhi, and Amar Manjhi had their bail rejected due to credible evidence—the victim's statement named them as perpetrators of abduction and sexual assault under IPC sections 363/34 and 366A. However, petitioners Bisheshwar Manjhi and Ramwati Devi were granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds each, as they had no alleged role in the sexual assault. The court found no compromise warranted given the heinous nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case