SURAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 90/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAR010005612026

e-Filing Number

15-01-2026

Filing Number

534/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

15-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Division Araria

Judge

3-District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

423

Police Station

RANIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ KUMAR

    Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR BACHCHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court rejected Suraj Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a kidnapping case involving the alleged abduction of an eighth-class girl for marriage purposes. The court found that all witnesses corroborated the occurrence of the crime, the investigation was pending, and the matter was of serious nature, making Kumar's release on anticipatory bail unsuitable at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District And Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Suraj Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a kidnapping case involving the alleged abduction of an eighth-class girl for marriage purposes. The court found that all witnesses corroborated the occurrence of the crime, the investigation was pending, and the matter was of serious nature, making Kumar's release on anticipatory bail unsuitable at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case