DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR AMIT SHARMA vs AFJAL & ANR — MAC.APP./840/2017

Disposed: -- on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Feb-2025

CNR: DLHC013403912017

Filing Number

MAC.APP./340391/2017

Filing Date

13-Sep-2017

Registration No

MAC.APP./840/2017

Registration Date

15-Sep-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 31-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR AMIT SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AFJAL & ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

    The Delhi High Court dismissed Delhi Jal Board's appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs. 4,23,150/- to Afjal (with 50% contributory negligence deduction) and Rs. 6,16,100/- to minor Subhana following a water tanker accident on October 15, 2014. The court upheld the MACT's disability assessments, finding no infirmity particularly regarding the minor's tender age, and rejected arguments that liability should be apportioned to the scooter driver's guardian, holding that in composite negligence cases, liability is joint and several. The full award amount was directed to be released to both claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Dr.jagminder Singh(dhjs)View PDF

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Dr.jagminder Singh(dhjs)View PDF

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  9. 06-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF

  10. 26-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta,hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  11. 10-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari SinghView PDF

  12. 11-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh SharmaView PDF

  13. 02-May-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Rekha PalliView PDF

  14. 22-Jul-2022

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar

  15. 03-Nov-2020

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Ms. Savitri (Dhjs)

  16. 19-Aug-2020

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Ms. Savitri (Dhjs)View PDF

  17. 27-Mar-2020

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  18. 13-Jan-2020

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)View PDF

  19. 13-Jan-2020

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  20. 24-Sep-2019

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  21. 23-May-2019

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  22. 13-Mar-2019

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  23. 29-Nov-2018

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  24. 29-Aug-2018

    Cases Listed Before Registrars

    Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ravinder Singh (Dhjs)

  25. 17-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 13-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC.APP./840/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed Delhi Jal Board's appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs. 4,23,150/- to Afjal (with 50% contributory negligence deduction) and Rs. 6,16,100/- to minor Subhana following a water tanker accident on October 15, 2014. The court upheld the MACT's disability assessments, finding no infirmity particularly regarding the minor's tender age, and rejected arguments that liability should be apportioned to the scooter driver's guardian, holding that in composite negligence cases, liability is joint and several. The full award amount was directed to be released to both claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case