SUBHASH ARORA AUGUSTINE CHATTERJEE & ASSO vs KALVINDER SINGH SANDHU & ORS — EX.P./54/2017
Disposed: -- on 20th March 2024.
CNR: DLHC012629992017
Filing Number
EX.P./262999/2017
Filing Date
26-May-2017
Registration No
EX.P./54/2017
Registration Date
27-May-2017
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Judicial Branch
Original side
Decision Date
20-Mar-2024
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 31-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBHASH ARORA AUGUSTINE CHATTERJEE & ASSO
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALVINDER SINGH SANDHU & ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti SinghView PDF
-
28-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti SinghView PDF
-
07-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin ChawlaView PDF
-
02-May-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
16-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
20-Mar-2024
CASE SUMMARY: EX.P. /54/2017 — Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors. The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition for specific performance of a property sale agreement. Decree holder Subhash Arora sought to enforce a 2016 judgment requiring judgment debtor Kalvinder Singh Sandhu to pay INR 10.65 crores for a Delhi property. The court rejected the bankruptcy trustee's intervention applications, finding the trustee neither necessary nor proper since he had already filed independent execution proceedings. The court upheld the parties' mediated settlement reducing consideration to INR 7.60 crores due to trespasser occupation, finding no collusion or coercion and dismissing objections to the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
05-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF
-
18-May-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
28-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
24-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
23-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
23-Jan-2023
Connected Matters (Short Matter)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan
-
31-Mar-2020
Short Matters
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta
-
10-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta GuptaView PDF
-
10-Feb-2020
Short Matters
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta
-
06-Nov-2019
Short Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath
-
05-Aug-2019
Short Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath
-
25-Apr-2019
Short Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath
-
02-Apr-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant NathView PDF
-
04-Feb-2019
Short Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath
-
19-Nov-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant NathView PDF
-
19-Nov-2018
Short Matters
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh
-
13-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant NathView PDF
-
13-Aug-2018
Short Matters
Cases Of B Court Arb. Matter W.E.F 5/4/2010
-
09-May-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai EndlawView PDF
-
09-May-2018
Short Matters
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
-
08-Mar-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai EndlawView PDF
-
20-Feb-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai EndlawView PDF
-
10-Nov-2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yogesh KhannaView PDF
-
10-Nov-2017
Short Matters
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta
-
24-Aug-2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev SachdevaView PDF
-
24-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu BakhruView PDF
-
26-May-2017
Case filed
Registration No. EX.P./54/2017
CASE SUMMARY: EX.P. /54/2017 — Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors. The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition for specific performance of a property sale agreement. Decree holder Subhash Arora sought to enforce a 2016 judgment requiring judgment debtor Kalvinder Singh Sandhu to pay INR 10.65 crores for a Delhi property. The court rejected the bankruptcy trustee's intervention applications, finding the trustee neither necessary nor proper since he had already filed independent execution proceedings. The court upheld the parties' mediated settlement reducing consideration to INR 7.60 crores due to trespasser occupation, finding no collusion or coercion and dismissing objections to the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts