SUBHASH ARORA AUGUSTINE CHATTERJEE & ASSO vs KALVINDER SINGH SANDHU & ORS — EX.P./54/2017

Disposed: -- on 20th March 2024.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-May-2017

CNR: DLHC012629992017

Filing Number

EX.P./262999/2017

Filing Date

26-May-2017

Registration No

EX.P./54/2017

Registration Date

27-May-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

Judicial Branch

Original side

Decision Date

20-Mar-2024

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 31-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH ARORA AUGUSTINE CHATTERJEE & ASSO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALVINDER SINGH SANDHU & ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium PrasadView PDF

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti SinghView PDF

  8. 28-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti SinghView PDF

  9. 07-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin ChawlaView PDF

  10. 02-May-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  11. 16-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  12. 20-Mar-2024

    View PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: EX.P. /54/2017 — Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors. The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition for specific performance of a property sale agreement. Decree holder Subhash Arora sought to enforce a 2016 judgment requiring judgment debtor Kalvinder Singh Sandhu to pay INR 10.65 crores for a Delhi property. The court rejected the bankruptcy trustee's intervention applications, finding the trustee neither necessary nor proper since he had already filed independent execution proceedings. The court upheld the parties' mediated settlement reducing consideration to INR 7.60 crores due to trespasser occupation, finding no collusion or coercion and dismissing objections to the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 10-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  14. 05-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaView PDF

  15. 18-May-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  16. 28-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  17. 24-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  18. 23-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF

  19. 23-Jan-2023

    Connected Matters (Short Matter)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan

  20. 31-Mar-2020

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta

  21. 10-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta GuptaView PDF

  22. 10-Feb-2020

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta

  23. 06-Nov-2019

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath

  24. 05-Aug-2019

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath

  25. 25-Apr-2019

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath

  26. 02-Apr-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant NathView PDF

  27. 04-Feb-2019

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath

  28. 19-Nov-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant NathView PDF

  29. 19-Nov-2018

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh

  30. 13-Aug-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant NathView PDF

  31. 13-Aug-2018

    Short Matters

    Cases Of B Court Arb. Matter W.E.F 5/4/2010

  32. 09-May-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai EndlawView PDF

  33. 09-May-2018

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw

  34. 08-Mar-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai EndlawView PDF

  35. 20-Feb-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai EndlawView PDF

  36. 10-Nov-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yogesh KhannaView PDF

  37. 10-Nov-2017

    Short Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta

  38. 24-Aug-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev SachdevaView PDF

  39. 24-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 29-May-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu BakhruView PDF

  41. 26-May-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./54/2017

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: EX.P. /54/2017 — Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors. The Delhi High Court disposed of an execution petition for specific performance of a property sale agreement. Decree holder Subhash Arora sought to enforce a 2016 judgment requiring judgment debtor Kalvinder Singh Sandhu to pay INR 10.65 crores for a Delhi property. The court rejected the bankruptcy trustee's intervention applications, finding the trustee neither necessary nor proper since he had already filed independent execution proceedings. The court upheld the parties' mediated settlement reducing consideration to INR 7.60 crores due to trespasser occupation, finding no collusion or coercion and dismissing objections to the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case