SOM NATH KHARBANDA TRITENT LEGAL vs MANOJ KUMAR MITTAL & ORS — RC.REV./313/2018

Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Jul-2022

CNR: DLHC011627012018

Filing Number

RC.REV./162701/2018

Filing Date

11-Jul-2018

Registration No

RC.REV./313/2018

Registration Date

13-Jul-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOM NATH KHARBANDA TRITENT LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR MITTAL & ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: RC.REV. 313/2018 & RC.REV. 376/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Delhi set aside the eviction order and allowed the tenants' revision petitions, finding that a genuine triable issue exists regarding respondent's ownership status. The court determined that where the claimant landlord's ownership is disputed by other co-owners (specifically respondent's nephew Mukul Mittal claiming exclusive ownership via alleged will), the landlord must prove his ownership as a threshold matter before eviction proceedings can proceed. Key Reasoning: Although landlords typically need only show superior title to tenants, when competing ownership claims exist among co-owners themselves—evidenced by a separate partition suit and FIR against the nephew for forging the will—the respondent cannot establish standing to file eviction without resolving these ownership disputes first. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh BanerjeeView PDF

  6. 25-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

  7. 03-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam BhambhaniView PDF

  8. 09-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher,hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta GanjuView PDF

  9. 07-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Kumar JainView PDF

  10. 09-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF

  11. 03-Apr-2024

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Bhawani SharmaView PDF

  12. 04-Mar-2024

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Bhawani SharmaView PDF

  13. 12-Apr-2023

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

  14. 05-Jul-2022

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad

  15. 09-Mar-2021

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri

  16. 07-Sep-2020

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva

  17. 17-Feb-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev SachdevaView PDF

  18. 17-Feb-2020

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi

  19. 23-Sep-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Brijesh SethiView PDF

  20. 23-Sep-2019

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri

  21. 26-Apr-2019

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru

  22. 08-Apr-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu BakhruView PDF

  23. 08-Apr-2019

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Rekha Palli

  24. 25-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Rekha PalliView PDF

  25. 25-Jan-2019

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.hari Shankar

  26. 30-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 16-Jul-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.k.gaubaView PDF

  28. 11-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. RC.REV./313/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RC.REV. 313/2018 & RC.REV. 376/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Delhi set aside the eviction order and allowed the tenants' revision petitions, finding that a genuine triable issue exists regarding respondent's ownership status. The court determined that where the claimant landlord's ownership is disputed by other co-owners (specifically respondent's nephew Mukul Mittal claiming exclusive ownership via alleged will), the landlord must prove his ownership as a threshold matter before eviction proceedings can proceed. Key Reasoning: Although landlords typically need only show superior title to tenants, when competing ownership claims exist among co-owners themselves—evidenced by a separate partition suit and FIR against the nephew for forging the will—the respondent cannot establish standing to file eviction without resolving these ownership disputes first. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case