UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ANIMESH SINHA vs KAMLESH ALIAS KAMLESH KUMAR & ANR. — FAO/89/2026

Disposed: -- on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: DLHC011102002025

Filing Number

FAO/9332298/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

FAO/89/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ANIMESH SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESH ALIAS KAMLESH KUMAR & ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

    The Delhi High Court rejected United India Insurance Company's appeal against a workers' compensation award, holding that the insurer remains liable under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 for a truck cleaner's death in a work-related accident despite the driver's license not being produced in proceedings. The court reasoned that liability arises from the employer-employee relationship and accident occurring during employment, and the insurer had already verified the driver's license when approving the vehicle damage claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani,hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar OhriView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court rejected United India Insurance Company's appeal against a workers' compensation award, holding that the insurer remains liable under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 for a truck cleaner's death in a work-related accident despite the driver's license not being produced in proceedings. The court reasoned that liability arises from the employer-employee relationship and accident occurring during employment, and the insurer had already verified the driver's license when approving the vehicle damage claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case