SHRI VIRENDER KAUSHIK VAIBHAV SHARMA vs SATISH JINDAL — RFA(COMM)/518/2024

Disposed: -- on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Dec-2024

CNR: DLHC010877602024

Filing Number

RFA(COMM)/5234039/2024

Filing Date

28-Nov-2024

Registration No

RFA(COMM)/518/2024

Registration Date

30-Nov-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI VIRENDER KAUSHIK VAIBHAV SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATISH JINDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    —View PDF

    The Delhi High Court set aside the District Judge's decree of Rs. 24,30,000 against the tenant (appellant), finding that the defendant's written statement—though reproducing the plaintiff's claims—did not constitute a clear, unambiguous admission of liability under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, but rather reflected inartful drafting coupled with a general denial. The court remitted the case for a proper trial, noting that triable issues existed regarding actual rent payments made and COVID-19 lockdown circumstances that warranted evidence appreciation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    After Notice Misc. Matters

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Joint Registrar(judicial) Sh. Ajay GulatiView PDF

  9. 16-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit MahajanView PDF

  10. 02-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Rekha PalliView PDF

  11. 28-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA(COMM)/518/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court set aside the District Judge's decree of Rs. 24,30,000 against the tenant (appellant), finding that the defendant's written statement—though reproducing the plaintiff's claims—did not constitute a clear, unambiguous admission of liability under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, but rather reflected inartful drafting coupled with a general denial. The court remitted the case for a proper trial, noting that triable issues existed regarding actual rent payments made and COVID-19 lockdown circumstances that warranted evidence appreciation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case