SHUBHAM PANDEY@BAMBAM & ORS. ROHIT vs STATE (NCT DELHI) — CRL.A./1469/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
CNR: DLHC010823992025
Filing Number
CRL.A./7332078/2025
Filing Date
16-Oct-2025
Registration No
CRL.A./1469/2025
Registration Date
25-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHUBHAM PANDEY@BAMBAM & ORS. ROHIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE (NCT DELHI)
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
Summary The Delhi High Court suspended the sentences of three appellants (Shubham Pandey, Aman, and Anand Prakash Pandey) convicted of murder (IPC §302/201/34) during pendency of their appeals. The court considered their young age (early 20s at incident), substantial custody period (5+ years), satisfactory jail conduct, and that the incident appeared unpremeditated and occurred during an altercation. The appellants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with specified conditions including monthly police reporting and non-contact with the deceased's family. The cross-FIR appeal (CRL.A. 1464/2025) was admitted for hearing on 18th August 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Criminal Appeals
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.A./1469/2025
Summary The Delhi High Court suspended the sentences of three appellants (Shubham Pandey, Aman, and Anand Prakash Pandey) convicted of murder (IPC §302/201/34) during pendency of their appeals. The court considered their young age (early 20s at incident), substantial custody period (5+ years), satisfactory jail conduct, and that the incident appeared unpremeditated and occurred during an altercation. The appellants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with specified conditions including monthly police reporting and non-contact with the deceased's family. The cross-FIR appeal (CRL.A. 1464/2025) was admitted for hearing on 18th August 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts