M/S RAM SAROOP RAM NIWAS RAJAT ANEJA vs BIMLA DEVI — RC.REV./196/2025

Disposed: -- on 15th July 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Jul-2025

CNR: DLHC010414222025

Filing Number

RC.REV./3795058/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

RC.REV./196/2025

Registration Date

08-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

Judicial Branch

APPELLATE SIDE

Decision Date

15-Jul-2025

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RAM SAROOP RAM NIWAS RAJAT ANEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIMLA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: RC.REV. 196/2025 The Delhi High Court dismissed M/S Ram Saroop Ram Niwas's application seeking further extension to vacate premises by December 31, 2027. The petitioner had already received multiple extensions (originally March 31, 2026, then June 1, 2026) and was ordered to vacate by June 1, 2026, paying Rs. 85,000 per month plus utilities. Justice Amit Sharma rejected the extension request, noting the petitioner had been given sufficient time and granting further extension would unjustly deprive the landlord Bimla Devi of premises for which she had obtained a successful eviction order based on bona fide business requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit SharmaView PDF

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF

  5. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RC.REV./196/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RC.REV. 196/2025 The Delhi High Court dismissed M/S Ram Saroop Ram Niwas's application seeking further extension to vacate premises by December 31, 2027. The petitioner had already received multiple extensions (originally March 31, 2026, then June 1, 2026) and was ordered to vacate by June 1, 2026, paying Rs. 85,000 per month plus utilities. Justice Amit Sharma rejected the extension request, noting the petitioner had been given sufficient time and granting further extension would unjustly deprive the landlord Bimla Devi of premises for which she had obtained a successful eviction order based on bona fide business requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case