H.M. INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED vs INCOME TAX WARD-11( — W.P.(C)/9711/2024
Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010412082024
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/2178927/2024
Filing Date
15-Jul-2024
Registration No
W.P.(C)/9711/2024
Registration Date
16-Jul-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Mehta
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.H.M. INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. RUCHESH SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.INCOME TAX WARD-11(
-
2.DELHI & ANR.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
The Delhi High Court allowed H.M. Infracon Private Limited's writ petition and quashed the income tax reassessment notice dated 31.03.2024 issued for assessment year 2014-15 as time-barred. The court held that since the notice was issued on 31.03.2024 (relevant to AY 2024-25), it exceeded the 10-year statutory period prescribed under Sections 149 and 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when calculated backward from AY 2024-25. The respondent-Department did not dispute this position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar
-
29-Apr-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
15-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/9711/2024
The Delhi High Court allowed H.M. Infracon Private Limited's writ petition and quashed the income tax reassessment notice dated 31.03.2024 issued for assessment year 2014-15 as time-barred. The court held that since the notice was issued on 31.03.2024 (relevant to AY 2024-25), it exceeded the 10-year statutory period prescribed under Sections 149 and 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when calculated backward from AY 2024-25. The respondent-Department did not dispute this position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts