PRASHANT AGGARWAL KSHITIZ AHUJA vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK & ANR. — W.P.(C)/12658/2023
Disposed: -- on 18th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010382882023
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/1761856/2023
Filing Date
21-Sep-2023
Registration No
W.P.(C)/12658/2023
Registration Date
22-Sep-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRASHANT AGGARWAL KSHITIZ AHUJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUNJAB AND SIND BANK & ANR.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Prashant Aggarwal against Punjab and Sind Bank in default on May 18, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite the matter being called twice. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri,hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikas MahajanView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
04-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj JainView PDF
-
24-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mini Pushkarna,hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh SharmaView PDF
-
08-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh SharmaView PDF
-
20-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh SharmaView PDF
-
30-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh SharmaView PDF
-
11-Jul-2024
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
29-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Mini PushkarnaView PDF
-
21-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/12658/2023
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Prashant Aggarwal against Punjab and Sind Bank in default on May 18, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite the matter being called twice. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts