NAIDU SUBBA RAO & ORS. vs JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR. Advocate - OM PRAKASH — W.P.(C)/8320/2025
Disposed: -- on 19th May 2026.
CNR: DLHC010371502025
Filing Number
W.P.(C)/3914278/2025
Filing Date
29-May-2025
Registration No
W.P.(C)/8320/2025
Registration Date
29-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula
Judicial Branch
APPELLATE SIDE
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAIDU SUBBA RAO & ORS.
Adv. PRANJAL ABROL
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR. Advocate - OM PRAKASH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF
Summary of W.P.(C) 8320/2025 The Delhi High Court allowed JNU Bioinformatics Centre employees' petition, directing they receive General Provident Fund-cum-Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme benefits from their absorption date (1 April 2002), instead of Contributory Provident Fund. The court held that upon regular absorption before the New Pension Scheme's introduction, employees could not be continued under CPF without conscious, informed pension-specific option—which was never obtained. CPF contributions will be refunded/adjusted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev NarulaView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Delhi High Court,hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anish DayalView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
11-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
30-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prateek JalanView PDF
-
29-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C)/8320/2025
Summary of W.P.(C) 8320/2025 The Delhi High Court allowed JNU Bioinformatics Centre employees' petition, directing they receive General Provident Fund-cum-Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme benefits from their absorption date (1 April 2002), instead of Contributory Provident Fund. The court held that upon regular absorption before the New Pension Scheme's introduction, employees could not be continued under CPF without conscious, informed pension-specific option—which was never obtained. CPF contributions will be refunded/adjusted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts